God With Us

“We divide in thought what is undivided in nature”

–Alan Watts, The Two Hands of God

 

As part of a class assignment, I was asked to submit a written reflection to the following question.

What most appeals to you, Jesus’ humanity, or divinity?

As the professor was walking out the door, I asked him, “Do we have to choose, one over the other?”  He answered, “Yes.”  His assignment was due in two weeks, and this is a version of what I wrote:

God is not divisible.

I am unable to offer a response to your line of questioning.  Jesus is not “part God and part Man,” …available to me as an object that I can break apart then pick and choose which most appeals to me. This is a path toward imagining a (false) god created in my own image.  I will only contemplate holding the mystery of Jesus’ humanity and divinity as “both/and.” 

Rather, what is most appealing to me; is to experience daily life “aware and receptive” of God’s Holy Spirit living in me, and I in it. And to recognize my identity “With Christ, In Christ, and Through Christ” as a reality and invitation to participating within the divine life of the Most Holy Trinity. My spiritual path is to seek and patiently await God’s Wisdom and Understanding in the joys and hardships of my life.

As it turned out, the professor was absent for the next class and never picked up our reflections. I did not learn his purpose for the assignment.

+++

Granted, the mystery of the Incarnation is difficult for our intellect. It takes conscious effort to suspend the mind’s intent on judging, controlling, and analyzing what it means to be fully human and fully divine (at the same time). Even when Jesus walked the earth, most of his contemporaries saw him only as a human being and missed who he was and most of them were religiously observant people.

So much depends on our idea of God. Our intellectual tendency is to split and divide Jesus’ humanity and divinity but, doing so has consequences.  No idea of Him, however pure and perfect, is adequate to express Him as He really is. Our idea of God tells us more about ourselves than about Him. When we are unable to balance humanity and divinity in Jesus, we are unable to balance it within ourselves distorting our own identity.

 

Jesus came to model the full integration for us and, in effect, told us that Divinity looked just like him – while he looked ordinarily human to everybody! Consider, (1 Cor 15:45-47)

The first man was from the earth, a man of dust; the second man is from heaven. As was the man of dust, so are those who are of the dust; and as is the man of heaven, so are those who are of heaven. Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the man of heaven.

As Christians, when we fail to honor the incarnate mystery of Jesus “fully human, fully divine” at the same time, …we fail to honor that same mystery inside ourselves or in one another.

Let us not desecrate our own natural unity by dividing ourselves, soul against body, as if the soul were good and the body as less so. If the two are separated from one another, we can no longer self-identify ourselves as a subsisting reality made in the image and likeness of God.

Suggested Reflection

An all-loving God who only desires union with man would not hesitate to offer himself to bring us back to Him.

Imagine what society, your belief systems, and your personal life would be if Jesus; fully man, fully divine had never come to earth.

What do you think would be different?


The featured image was done with egg tempera on watercolor paper in the style of manuscript illumination.

ps. My resources for this reflection is from Scripture, the Catechism and “The Naked Now, Learning to See as the Mystics See, by Richard Rohr.

raison d’etre

20 years back while while on retreat, I chanced upon a small “out of the way” room hoping for a few minutes of private solitude between talks. The room had a small altar with a few chairs. After about twenty minutes, an elderly woman comes in and begins setting the altar for liturgy. She struggles to light the tall paschal candle. A few minutes later, an old curmudgeon looking priest walks in and takes his turn struggling with the same candle. I am taller, so I offer my assistance. After struggling myself, the old priest utters, “Don’t worry about it, it’s not required for salvation.” I return to my chair and the three of us join in liturgical worship.

To this day, the saying “Don’t worry about it, it’s not required for salvation,”continues to echo and shape my spiritual journey especially when discerning matters of faith. Even more so when I hear debates between different faith traditions. Religious debates seldom focus on what is truly required for salvation.

Recently, I was reminded when asked by a young Catholic man whose Protestant friend critique the Catholic faith, particularly regarding Jesus’ mother. I promised the young man that I would do a little research and follow up with a few thoughts.

To begin, there are many others who hold a far deeper devotion to the mother of Jesus than I.  My devotion (not worship) to Jesus’ mother can be understood in the graceful words of the Hail Mary prayer which is formed explicitly from Luke’s gospel. And the other is to entrust the spiritual care of my own children and grandchildren to Jesus’ own mother.

I am not a biblical scholar or theologian. Nor do I consider myself an apologist rather I depend on Jesus and His gospel to defend me. I am simply walking a spiritual path, just like any one else, searching for God’s Truth and Will for my life.

I was doubly motivated to write this blog since the call from the young man inquiring about Mary’s Immaculate Conception came just a few weeks after completing a wood carving of the iconic image of Jesus’ mother. It is one of those “holy coincidences,” or moments of Grace, I believe.

Dogma is developed not strictly by explicit biblical reference but also by implicit biblical references – both literal and holistically. The “dogma” of the Immaculate Conception is supported with multiple Old Testament typologies that point to New Testament affirmations.

I will touch on a rough schematic of thought. Therefore, do not take my word, …. instead, go directly to the bible, or to the online Catechism of the Catholic Church at http://ccc.usccb.org/flipbooks/catechism/index.html#I which defines biblical support for all its its teachings.

The way to think about the Immaculate Conception is that the Mother of Jesus was redeemed from the moment of her conception. This is based on God’s predestination of Mary to be the Mother of the Incarnate Word.

Predestination is God’s gratuitous “fore-choice” of creatures for salvation. Mary was not the only human creature predestined as St. Paul speaks in (Eph 1:3-6) and St. John speaks in his first letter (1 Jn 4:10).

Many scholars and theologians consider Genesis 3:15 as OT typology revealing the Father’s fore-love of Mary and her unique role in salvation history of being chosen for the eventual birthing of the Redeemer. Luke 1:26-38, is a primary New Testament affirmation of  this “favor with God” and then another in Revelation 12.

When taking a biblical account of Mary’s presence and role through the Annunciation, Nativity, Presentation in the Temple, intercessory role at Cana, Crucifixion, and Pentecost is it not within human reason to consider – that the mother of our Savior “was enriched by God with gifts appropriate to such a role?

Devotion to Mary is not listed in the Ten Commandments, nor do we find any mention of it in the Beattitudes, but ponder this thought;

“Anyone who is spiritually united to Jesus through baptism and filial adoption has also, in a particular way, received the Mother of Jesus as his or her own spiritual mother. This mother offers an immaculate human model of Christian discipleship to Jesus for the entire People of God, and at the same time intercedes as a mother in the order of grace for her Son’s disciples who seek to respond to the Lord’s invitation to Christian holiness with their own personal fiat of faith.”  (M. Miravalle)

Even if one relies solely on a strict literal biblical interpretation,  Mary’s role in salvation history is unique.

I’ve never considered devotion to Jesus’ mother “required for salvation,” but if one’s devotion to Mary guides that person to a deeper reality of her Son, …as the Way, the Truth, and the Life, …so be it.

We all have to find our own return to God.


The featured image includes my recent wood carving of Jesus’ Mother. Take note of her hands and to what she is presenting to you.

 

ps. feel free to comment

Mother of Tenderness

What does the loving glance of a mother holding her infant child speak, …but that startling glow of Grace.

What do the eyes of the child return, …but the gift of its Soul.

Who cannot see the halo bright and warm, …as the moon’s glow?


The featured image is an icon titled, “Mother of Tenderness.” It is one of my favorite images of Jesus’s mother. It signifies the private relationship between Mother and Child. I painted it for my daughter soon after she announced her first pregnancy.

In the world of sacred icons of the Mother of Jesus, there are three main ontological categories according to three distinct images of action (or three types of relationship) of spirit and matter, against the background of the earthly, heavenly and divine.

  1. Our Lady of Tenderness (joy):
  2. Our Lady of the Way (ascent, guidance):
  3. Our Lady of the Sign (the standing vigilant before God in prayer).

 

Verified by MonsterInsights