Naturally

“The most important thing of all is to get some realization of what God is doing in your soul.”

Thomas Merton, What is Contemplation?

In a recent course on Christology, the class was asked to respond to the following question:

Identify the most important information contained in the gospels that bear on the incarnation of Jesus Christ.

I was quite excited about this because it offered me a chance to share an insight from something I heard from a Scott Hahn lecture on the gospel of John. Below was my response to the class assignment:

The virginal conception reveals that in his divine nature,…Jesus has only God as his father. It reveals that he is the natural son of God so he is fully divine.  

At the same time, he’s born of the Virgin Mary. So he receives his human nature from Mary, his mother. So he is naturally the son of his mother.

In other words, Jesus is (NATURALLY) the son of the Father, according to his divine nature, and he is (NATURALLY) the son of his mother Mary, according to his human nature. Fully human, …Fully divine.

The virgin birth speaks of Jesus Christ in whom is united full deity and full humanity – and the atoning action of (full deity and full humanity) on the cross for the reparation of the broken covenant.

Surprisingly, I received quite a bit of push-back from my classmates who were challenging my use of the word “naturally.”

Classmate 1

I get your point but I think we need to be very careful in the use of the word “naturally.”  As Jesus was begotten which is of course not natural perhaps it would be better to say He is undeniably Son of God and son of Mary.

Classmate 2

When I read your post I thought of the word”supernatural” when it came to the incarnation. Something”natural” in the spiritual realm, such as an action of the Holy Spirit with the Blessed Mother, strikes me as “supernatural.” CCC1998/1722 defines supernatural as surpassing the power of created beings; a result of God’s gracious initiative.

To my further dismay, my two professors failed to defend or clarify the issue as it is supported by Church teaching (CCC 503), as follows:

Jesus has only God as Father. “He was never estranged from the Father because of the human nature which he assumed . . . . He is naturally Son of the Father as to his divinity and naturally son of his mother as to his humanity, but properly Son of the Father in both natures.”

+++

I am sure every one has moments when someone shares an innovative perspective on some issue and it cause you to realize, “I never thought about it that way.”  It resets the mental or spiritual point of view to a fresh way to see and understand. Well, that is what Scott Hahn’s comment along with its validation in the catechism about the mystical conception of the Incarnate Word: Jesus Christ, did for me.

Contrary to the groupthink of my classmates and professor, I held my ground. I suspect there is a reason the Church uses the term “naturally” equally to both the full divinity and humanity of Jesus Christ. Supernatural and Natural suggest two radically distinguished realms: one of the created order and the other of God; one of nature and the other of grace. In essence, supernatural suggest a sphere of reality that is sharply opposed to nature suggesting a stark duality in Christ and ignoring our able participation with the universal divine immanence in humanity and in the creation. 

This may all seem a bit foolish or abstract so I will get to the point: The words we choose to communicate are simply pointers that direct our intellectual reasoning. When our reasoning is misdirected so is our walk in faith and contemplation of Truth.

As scripture points us to faith of being created in the image or likeness to God. So, to what ever degree we get God “wrong,” we get ourselves “wrong.”  When we divide God into parts, we also divide (or fracture) ourselves into parts. This is the condition for sin in our lives and simply not our true identity In Christ, With Christ, and Through Christ.

Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you? If any one destroys God’s temple, God will destroy him. For God’s temple is holy, and that temple you are. (1 Cor 3:16-17)

Phillip Sherrad’s  “Christian Understanding of Man,” unpacks it well:

[M]an is not merely other than God, irreducibly alien to God, but is on the contrary the specific expression of God’s creative energy and participates in this energy as a condition of having any existence whatsoever. Grace, that is to say, is not something extrinsic, not something added to man’s nature; it is inherent in the conditions of his birth…the idea of divine immanence – of the indwelling of God in the creature is foreshadowed…In this thought the presentiment of the immanence of the divine principle is expressed above all through the concept of participation. 

With a confidence that God is With Us, let us meditate upon a most important thing of all:

to get some realization of what God is doing in our soul. Not what I am doing but what God is doing.

It is the action verb that precedes our proclamation:

My soul proclaims the greatness of the Lord and my spirit rejoices in God my Saviour


The featured image is from the icon of the Annunciation that I wrote a few years back. I am particularly drawn to the representation of Jesus positioned near the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Allow it to help you see this same “Christ-mystery” indwelling within you.

God With Us

“We divide in thought what is undivided in nature”

–Alan Watts, The Two Hands of God

 

As part of a class assignment, I was asked to submit a written reflection to the following question.

What most appeals to you, Jesus’ humanity, or divinity?

As the professor was walking out the door, I asked him, “Do we have to choose, one over the other?”  He answered, “Yes.”  His assignment was due in two weeks, and this is a version of what I wrote:

God is not divisible.

I am unable to offer a response to your line of questioning.  Jesus is not “part God and part Man,” …available to me as an object that I can break apart then pick and choose which most appeals to me. This is a path toward imagining a (false) god created in my own image.  I will only contemplate holding the mystery of Jesus’ humanity and divinity as “both/and.” 

Rather, what is most appealing to me; is to experience daily life “aware and receptive” of God’s Holy Spirit living in me, and I in it. And to recognize my identity “With Christ, In Christ, and Through Christ” as a reality and invitation to participating within the divine life of the Most Holy Trinity. My spiritual path is to seek and patiently await God’s Wisdom and Understanding in the joys and hardships of my life.

As it turned out, the professor was absent for the next class and never picked up our reflections. I did not learn his purpose for the assignment.

+++

Granted, the mystery of the Incarnation is difficult for our intellect. It takes conscious effort to suspend the mind’s intent on judging, controlling, and analyzing what it means to be fully human and fully divine (at the same time). Even when Jesus walked the earth, most of his contemporaries saw him only as a human being and missed who he was and most of them were religiously observant people.

So much depends on our idea of God. Our intellectual tendency is to split and divide Jesus’ humanity and divinity but, doing so has consequences.  No idea of Him, however pure and perfect, is adequate to express Him as He really is. Our idea of God tells us more about ourselves than about Him. When we are unable to balance humanity and divinity in Jesus, we are unable to balance it within ourselves distorting our own identity.

 

Jesus came to model the full integration for us and, in effect, told us that Divinity looked just like him – while he looked ordinarily human to everybody! Consider, (1 Cor 15:45-47)

The first man was from the earth, a man of dust; the second man is from heaven. As was the man of dust, so are those who are of the dust; and as is the man of heaven, so are those who are of heaven. Just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the man of heaven.

As Christians, when we fail to honor the incarnate mystery of Jesus “fully human, fully divine” at the same time, …we fail to honor that same mystery inside ourselves or in one another.

Let us not desecrate our own natural unity by dividing ourselves, soul against body, as if the soul were good and the body as less so. If the two are separated from one another, we can no longer self-identify ourselves as a subsisting reality made in the image and likeness of God.

Suggested Reflection

An all-loving God who only desires union with man would not hesitate to offer himself to bring us back to Him.

Imagine what society, your belief systems, and your personal life would be if Jesus; fully man, fully divine had never come to earth.

What do you think would be different?


The featured image was done with egg tempera on watercolor paper in the style of manuscript illumination.

ps. My resources for this reflection is from Scripture, the Catechism and “The Naked Now, Learning to See as the Mystics See, by Richard Rohr.

Verified by MonsterInsights